Indonesian Muslims’ Cognitive Pattern on Social Media During Political Disagreements
AbstractThe 2017 Jakarta governor election had encouraged polarization among Muslims, including among media social users: those who agreed and those who disagreed with voting for Basuki Ahok Tjahaja Purnama since he was prosecuted for allegedly committing blasphemy. This study has examined the cognitive pattern amongst disputants: whether cognitive pattern and religiosity contribute to political disagreements or not. Participants were Indonesia’s Muslim social media users (N=300). Using multiple regression analysis, the findings have demonstrated that analytical thinking produces higher disagreement than holistic thinking. In addition, higher level of religiosity produces higher disagreement.
Batson, C.D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W.L. (1993). Religion and the individual. A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Benway, K.N., & Nesselroade, K.P. (2000, April). Self-enhancing patterns of Christian liberal arts and university students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, OR.
Djupe, P., & Calfano, B. (2012). American Muslim investment in civil society: Political discussion, disagreement, and tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 516-528. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41635252
Glock, C.Y. (1973). Religion in sociological perspective: Essays in the empirical study of religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Huckfeldt, R., Paul E. J., &John S. (2004). The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press
Huber, S., & Huber, O.W. (2012). The centrality of religious scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. Doi: 10.3390/rel3030710.
Klofstad, C.A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60 (2), 180-91.
Klofstad, C.A, Sokhey, A.E, & McClurg, S.D. (2012). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 00(0), 1-15.
Marcus, G.E., John L.S, Elizabeth, T.E., & Sandra, W. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press
McClurg, S.D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 448-64.
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
Parsons, B. (2010). Social networks and the affective impact of political disagreement. Political Behavior, 4(2), 181-204. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40587315
Potter, D. (2013). Religious disagreement: Internal and external. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74(1), 21-31. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709253
Stark, R., & Glock, C.Y. (1968). American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Los Angeles, CA: Berkeley University Pres.
Varnum, M., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19 (1), 9-13. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41038530