Indonesian Muslims’ Cognitive Pattern on Social Media During Political Disagreements

Rena Latifa, Abdul Rahman Shaleh, Melanie Nyhof

Abstract


The 2017 Jakarta governor election had encoura­ged polarization among Muslims, including among media social users: those who agreed and tho­se who disagreed with voting for Basuki Ahok Tjahaja Purnama since he was prose­cuted for allegedly committing blasphemy. This study has examined the cognitive pattern amongst disputants: whet­her cognitive pattern and religiosity contribute to poli­tical disagreements or not. Participants were Indonesia’s Muslim social media users (N=300). Using multiple regres­sion analysis, the findings have demonstrated that analytical thin­king produces higher disagreement than ho­listic thinking. In addition, higher level of religiosity produces higher disagree­ment.

Keywords


Indonesian Muslim; political disagreements; cognitive pattern; social media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Batson, C.D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W.L. (1993). Religion and the individual. A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

Benway, K.N., & Nesselroade, K.P. (2000, April). Self-enhancing patterns of Christian liberal arts and university students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Portland, OR.

Djupe, P., & Calfano, B. (2012). American Muslim investment in civil society: Political discussion, disagreement, and tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 516-528. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41635252

Glock, C.Y. (1973). Religion in sociological perspective: Essays in the empirical study of religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

Huckfeldt, R., Paul E. J., &John S. (2004). The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press

Huber, S., & Huber, O.W. (2012). The centrality of religious scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. Doi: 10.3390/rel3030710.

Klofstad, C.A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60 (2), 180-91.

Klofstad, C.A, Sokhey, A.E, & McClurg, S.D. (2012). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 00(0), 1-15.

Marcus, G.E., John L.S, Elizabeth, T.E., & Sandra, W. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press

McClurg, S.D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 448-64.

Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.

Parsons, B. (2010). Social networks and the affective impact of political disagreement. Political Behavior, 4(2), 181-204. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40587315

Potter, D. (2013). Religious disagreement: Internal and external. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74(1), 21-31. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709253

Stark, R., & Glock, C.Y. (1968). American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Los Angeles, CA: Berkeley University Pres.

Varnum, M., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19 (1), 9-13. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41038530




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15642/jki.2018.8.1.1-18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Komunikasi Islam (JKI) by http://jki.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/jki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats